South Park Dolls Free Paterns

Mourinho's smile

"We believed and arrogant, and now we are on a tightrope." A rational culé.

When discussed in the press that the club will go up next week (after the 3-1 defeat last night in the field of Inter Milan in Champions League game) and you need a male to advance to the final not enough emphasis is to explain how difficult it will be. At least, if you look at history. No team has won the Champions League two years running but that is no more complicated statistics to be broken. And all because Inter Milan has won the two-goal lead facing the second leg, something no team had managed in the semifinals of the 5 previous years.

In season 2004/05 , Milan beat PSV Eindhoven 2-0 in the first leg of the semifinals. Until yesterday, this was the biggest lead he had gotten a semifinalist team over another in the first leg of the last 12 years. The last time that had happened before was in season 1997/98 , when the R. Madrid won 2-0 at Borussia Dortmund in the first leg of the semifinals played in the Bernabeu. In both cases, the losing team could not overcome in the second leg (PSV was eliminated by the double value of away goals (3-1) and the Germans went from a tie to 0).

the past 30 years, only in DOS times a team has come back two goals in a semi-final European Cup / Champions League. If it's any consolation to us for the Catalans, one of them starred ship in 1986 against Gothenburg. And rallied 3 goals.

But the bad news for Barca statistics do not end there. Since there is a format Champions League (18 years), only in DOS sometimes have traced two goals in the playoffs (playoffs from knockout round). Both times were in the same issue ( 2003-04) and two in Quarterfinals: Deportivo la Coruna overturned a 4-1 to Milan (4-0 in Riazor) and Monaco beat Real Madrid (4-2 in the first leg 3-1 in the round).

The previous history, in the European Cup, is found in the year 1989 when, in the quarterfinals on Turkish Galatasaray won 5-0 at Neuchatel Switzerland, neutralizing the 3-0 first-leg. To this, add three cases in 21 years of play-offs (of sixteen onwards).

However, it must be said: the end of the 2004/05 season , neutralized Liverpool AC Milan 3 goals in just half time and then won on penalties. That is a unique case in 55-year history of the continental tournaments. Comparable only to what made the R. Madrid at the end of the first European Cup in History ( 1956), in which they rallied from a 0-2 to Stade de Reims and ended up winning 4-3.

Although it remains to be playing around, the statistics said that the club is "fotutos." But, as they say, the statistics are to be broken. After all, Inter 38 years ago has not played a final of the continental showpiece.

well Guardiola ago asking for the support of the fans for the second leg. If by statistics, you're going to make much needed.

ERRATA: The precedent of a 2-0 Champions League semi-finals, before the Milan-PSV was not R.Madrid-Borussia Dortmund (97/98), but the Bayern Munich-R.Madrid (99/00). Therefore, there are two precedents in 10 years (or three in 12 years). However, in all cases, there was no comeback in the second leg.

Pulmonary Aspiration Treatmentdrowning

Garzon cat catches you

I'm not the only one who thinks the judge Baltasar Garzón has never disliked at all certain role. Do not know shut up and sit still (sure is Sagittarius!) And that bothers many people. Especially those people loving discretion as are their guildmates. Can not be said to be strange to return to play a leading role in the current political scene, but imagine it in a different bench (the defendant) that usually takes regularly (the judge), it can be seen, at least, unusual. The most peculiar part is that this case has an explosive element: three cases against him and one of them is related to its claim to investigate and / or prosecute, even at the symbolic level, the crimes of a dictatorship military (this time the English). And that despite the social unpopularity often dictatorships in much of the western world.

However, pending events and forward to reading other expert opinion of trust ( Buxted, !!!!), date the hint would be kept in mind two points: First, less than a year ago (May 27, 2009) was accepted to process the application Garzón , which means that opening a judgmental procedure against him because the demand was in line with law, but that there was necessarily represent trial against him. That changed, less than two weeks when the judge announced that Luciano Varela had evidence of malfeasance crime (crime committed by public officials to be missing, knowingly or inexcusable ignorance, the obligations and duties of his office) and, therefore, it would trial against him. This announcement gave rise to certain social reactions (satisfaction to some, alarm and outrage for others). However, beyond the exchange of accusations, do not forget to bring some common sense.

The first is the presumption of innocence . That trial is unusual to see a judge does not mean necessarily guilty. I'm no expert legal, but my little notions of right make me think to prove a crime of "trespass" is not as easy as it looks. Eleven years ago, also judge Javier Gomez de Liano already been convicted of such crime (although pardoned by Aznar in 2000) but the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg dictate in their favor eight years later. While the judge Varela said " nor is it certain as to the absence of crime, or is arbitrary, unreasonable or absurd accusatory possible evaluation by transgression," the difference that if there is such a crime and words appear larger. "He ignored Garzón amnesty law (for crimes of the dictatorship or political positions of the same) in 1976?. Be seen, as he justified the day writing out the possibility that apply in certain cases (the remnants of right do these things.) And if the excess is considered by the judge, and can motivate them well, because the Strasbourg Court (and even the International Court in The Hague), may be happy to discuss the calculations done there is no law amnesty may resist when it comes to "crimes against humanity" in these types of courts. So do not let no one. This could go for long.

Another detail: the General Council of Judicial Power (CGPJ) is the governing body of judges. On Thursday (April 22) will arise if you take precautionary measures to stay Garzon function, but something stands out: if the National Court judge had trespassed on a flashy, would it not have taken other measures CGPJ acting ex officio, in the two previous years?.

Secondly, it is hard to believe that the judiciary have wanted to "mess": Really there are many judges who will stake his reputation on an ideological or personal animosity?. For that would be eager loaded one by his comrade-star known to prosecute would be just the beginning of a string of problems, some far-reaching media, which podráin finish "popularized" in and out of Spain. As I said, dictatorships do not arouse sympathy, especially outside of where they occur, and therefore the pressure will be enormous from all sides. This is a topic that will attract many cameras and many "flashes." Any sentence will be examined under the microscope (especially if guilty), thus opening a possible escalation of complaints and allegations, I think, generate some discomfort that the vast majority of judges do not feel much like to suffer from free, for very conservative and that fachillas be. So do not think that acting on "love of art."

Third, sometimes see the tree can not see the forest. It seems that Garzon is in a difficult situation but this whole process may have an unexpected effect even for its own whistleblowers: their "victim" may eventually develop into a martyr or a champion of justice. The media have a weakness for these figures. And the more "crushed" that is, arouse more sympathy. They might even leave other "waiters" European. A legacy of the martyrs is that Rodman all about them. And the theme of the English dictatorship may well again found a gap in the international press. Indeed, the opposite was intended, which was to keep buried.

In all this, there is another detail that breaks the schemes, that are involved in this process itself figures like Luciano Varela judge or magistrate Joaquin Gimenez, founders of the progressive "Judges for Democracy." That the "Amnesty Law" the conservative justices defend exercising from time immemorial, yet understood. But they do considerable progress ... just do not add up. One explanation I can find is seeking to avoid a politicized and divided Supreme Court, in which they gave the impression that the conservative majority held a "vendetta" against a judge very upset, that would discredit to the guild in general. So the best option would be to share the "management of process." Lest molestísimos generating unprecedented.

'll see how things develop. What is clear is that each play a part. And that will not lack resources Garzón.