Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Removing Inverness Starter Earrings

tiger hunting

few days ago, the American golfer Tiger Woods press conference reported in returning to the racetrack. No doubt great news for golf fans (I'm not much), a few months ago were somewhat orphaned when the best player in the last few decades (taking into account the award honors) announced that he was temporarily sports activities to steer a personal life in the midst of conflict as a result of their marital separation. Beyond that it has resolved his personal problems, something tells me many economic interests hidden behind this expected return. Perhaps

Woods has everything (to many people) can dream: a billionaire and is a sports star. But it is another striking example: one of those "broken toys" that the media have shown us for so long as a paradigm of success ... before starting to smash it in every way possible to make fallen idol. In addition, they have done all kinds of evading responsibility in her private life went under (must be informed, "as one) and blaming it exclusively for all their woes. First picked him up at the altar of victory and made him a model for youth, but when they saw that pulling down kicking and knocking this model could make more money, they did as usual. A great example of collective moral ... offering a sample of that dose of hypocrisy that keeps her alive.

Golf seems to me an elitist sport and very wealthy class. Since I do not belong to the social strata of those professional practitioners, I can identify with Woods. Neither me nor I have identified as a model. In any case I might admire in the sport. For that reason, do not think his private life and his harem of lovers is my business ... nor in that of many. Not the Caesar or the Emperor or my elected representative office. And that of "public figures" ... not always choose the "public" and to them must be some limit (which will transgress who "prostitute" their privacy). One could understand that, if paid cuertas sums (perhaps a little out of proportion) in image rights a person should be so that it is somehow exemplary. The image is attached to the product. Therefore, many sponsors would pull hair when he started the media lynching, carried out by so many "moralists" who have profited at the expense of worked-up as a hero and then ... have profited at the expense of criticizing their morality. The athlete is the same: The person, apparently not. But it matters: after all, the real person does not know hardly anyone ... and what aim is to keep the mob entertained! And now it blaze john "¡¡¡¡ adulterer "!!!! (As well posh!)

not feel sorry for Woods (well, maybe a little). As I said, has all the resources to have a perfect life and have been their own mistakes and shortcomings that have led to this situation. He was aware that his image, by entering a lot of money, could be prejudiced if they knew certain aspects of your life that are not well regarded in society that it has provided more than comfortable life. However, in all this, I can idiosyncratic to do that envy exists. Precisely because this guy has everything, from money, popularity and prestige to a stunningly beautiful woman (you can see in the picture at left), there are many people eager to see him fall as a figure. In our society can not accept that there is perfection. Nor, especially, there are things that we individually and subjectively perfect and meet in the other, but not us. After all, happiness is not "can take" as much to anybody. Why anyone, right?
Building

0 comments:

Post a Comment