Fun Modern Cutting The Cake Songs

value of Athena Torture

A friend of mine, high school teacher, a work of philosophy suspended a student because he had copied in full from a website. The student's mother angrily called for an interview with the teacher so that he would give an explanation and the teacher, to avoid any doubt about their objectivity, printed texts copied from the web plagiarized, with its corresponding address. He taught all the material to the student's parent, but apparently, the evidence was not convincing enough for her. The obviousness could not be higher: in their opinion the suspension was based clearly on a subjective animus (the technical term is "mania") the teacher by the student and therefore urged him to abandon its attitude. There was no other logical choice to pass to his son because he had reserved space for next year at the School of Police and for that, should state that had passed the baccalaureate. The teacher insisted he had nothing to person against the student and was not going to change my mind and that its assessment was based solely on an objective element: plagiarize someone else's work when asked their own work. But that seemed no more than excuses. The mother said she would speak with the head of the school and complain of their work because it was a "bad teacher."

This is one such example which unleashed so much irritation in the educational community: parents who behave in a more childlike than their children and end up make it difficult for educational practice of teachers. The common debate about who is primarily responsible for the education of young people just encountering similar situations, or overprotective parents who responsibly educate their children or allow anyone else to do while the teacher or teacher's work is not as in itself, to "tame" to anyone. Consequently, the concept of "individual responsibility" that is often passed from father to son is lost as a witness caught in a relay race and the consequences are soon apparent. Adolescent and youth rebellion, indiscipline in the classroom, rude dudes ... It seems that the youth of today are more desmadradada y desorientada que nunca. Y los padres también más perdidos que nunca. La presencia mediática de programas televisivos como "SOS Adolescentes" y otros análogos son vivo ejemplo que, si bien el choque generacional siempre ha sido un constante, la actualidad se está mostrando con una especial intensidad, a través de un proceso latente de fractura social cada vez más creciente entre generaciones de padres e hijos, cuyas vías para el diálogo resultan repletas de enormes obstáculos cuando no han quedado ya destrozadas. Y, al final, nadie sale beneficiado de esta situación. Pero no todo va a ser culpa de los progenitores. Algo habrá fallado también en nuestro modelo educativo.

Frecuentemente has commented that the implementation of the Education Act 90, the LOGSE , was a failure for his bold attempt to assess the degree of personal maturity of the students rather than their memory capacity, which represented them learning for learning rather than the classic, competitive and motivating search results. Philosophy itself seemed very noble, but in practice was a disaster: it was said to be losing the culture of effort and difficult to discipline in the classroom. But could he evaluated the performance of a new educational model, as innovative as bold in making a qualitative leap in the educational field, in just a few years? It is clear that the results were very encouraging for the 90, but expect a completely different education system in the previous few years Calara as was also a bit naive. Assimilation not only had to run some of the students, but also by parents who had been educated with a different model and could not expect the same results. Especially because the Education of 70, regulated by the laws of a military dictatorship, had nothing to do with the 90's. However, given the feeling that, not losing a "harvest" can end up losing two (or more). Laws have been two more (LOCE, 2002, LOE, 2006) and it is unclear go to work. But it is even more clear that something is not going to leave the overnight and requires patience, patience. Maybe the "social experiment" to have an impact on a generation of students, but if there are many undesirable effects, it is always better to be one and not more than one. Especially if we think in the medium to long term, with the aim of having a more skilled workforce in the future, definitely, allow a quantum leap to the English economy. To make something work, takes time. More than a mandate or two.

Meanwhile, we are facing an economic crisis with certain social factors do not help much to overcome. On the one hand, the English company has a large group of elderly (over 50 years), within which does not highlight the high level of training. Many who suffer the crisis, especially unemployment, are not sure how to deal with these times in an autonomous way, encounter difficulties in retraining and horrors have difficulty adapting to the new technological society. Rely exclusively on the welfare state and lack initiative. On the other hand, it also speaks volumes about the Generation 'neither-nor' , which affects groups of younger adults, among whom there is also a percentage considerably more than individuals who are not studying, not working, living parent and want to maintain a comfortable standard of living. So the relay is not encouraging.

I think everyone, not just the educational community, we have a problem with the fact the average is so low formation. Life is more than are degrees and diplomas, but they remember the value of effort and improve self-esteem in many cases. And currently, many workers and potential workers is at rock bottom. It is critical that we do look at us. And above all, that we realize we can not blame the Pope or the State, to protect us too much, or who are around us by having us mania. Maybe it's time to do their own work. And do not copy others. Ready.