It's getting into fashion writing about controversial statements the Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd , those in which called on Muslims want to live under Islamic law ca 
that throughout Australia and, among other things, persuaded the immigrants living in the islands to their incorporation, however, to be directed to any departure gate. Apparently those comments, that few people, although politically incorrect, believes that there may be more suitable and accurate (no more to see publications that have been made in various blogs and websites) have raised online have enormous admiration for the veteran Labour, who are branded as exemplary and courageous politician, capable of daring to say what so many think and dare not say publicly. However, an admiration that is based on a photo and a text because, curiously, not running any video image or audio you see or hear that Mr. Ruud making such statements. And it's not hard to imagine why. Probably never existed.
that throughout Australia and, among other things, persuaded the immigrants living in the islands to their incorporation, however, to be directed to any departure gate. Apparently those comments, that few people, although politically incorrect, believes that there may be more suitable and accurate (no more to see publications that have been made in various blogs and websites) have raised online have enormous admiration for the veteran Labour, who are branded as exemplary and courageous politician, capable of daring to say what so many think and dare not say publicly. However, an admiration that is based on a photo and a text because, curiously, not running any video image or audio you see or hear that Mr. Ruud making such statements. And it's not hard to imagine why. Probably never existed. two years ago and was published the "fake" internet : A website claimed that such a statement had been made by former Australian Prime Minister, the conservative John Howard, three years earlier. But it seems, taking advantage of the mainland Australia takes a little away from both Europe and North America, it did not matter but to keep alive the message something xenophobic, adapting to modern times. Also a plus: the leading Labour politician in question is and, therefore, is considered a representative of the working class, while the left-right ideological axis is different in the "politics" Anglo-Saxon. Neither is going to see if it was true: the point is that the whole world know how bad and terrorists are all Muslims and how they want imposed on the rest on the ground because, so we are told in the West, he wishes the Koran.
defense not making a hippie, replete with philanthropy and peace to men of goodwill. In addition, as many people do not sympathize too much with certain traditions of Islam, especially those that are implemented on its most intolerant. But then to say that a politician is a model and "courageous" by putting cane to immigrants and people of other religions, I find it cheap populism. Why? Because riding a Badulaque to ask him to fit, but the sheik billionaire makes you turn the ball. Religion has nothing to do. And when the global investors are going to certain countries (for doing business, it never gets objection to "detail" that the partners represent a theocratic state that oppresses its citizens through religion), it must make enormous efforts waiver of customs (well, Yes, in many places, women must cover their hair and / or shoulders in public). In fact, in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, which are Arab Emirates, some local companies with foreign shareholders provided land to build your home y. .. their center of worship for.
addition, in the case of Australia, it is so easy to refute the charge of those statements (if it was actually Australian): After centuries of immigration (well, at first called it colonization) Saxon, and tell me What percentage of the population, generation after generation, has been concerned to learn the native language or respect Aboriginal religion. In fact, the company cut neophyte WASP (White AngloSaxon Protestant) moved decades ago to indigenous societies, which exceeded the population and, as a result, could become hegemonic (in South Africa, however, the immigrant population never able to outnumber the native and had to invent the "apartheid"). Founded the Australian state in a territory that centuries ago was not even yours. And until 1967 did not recognize the slightest right the original settlers. So, basically, it follows that there is some fear that today's immigrants do what they did the ancestors immigrants from the current Australian society.
However, I want to make clear that I have no problem 
Inguna or the Australian state (Australia I think a very interesting destination), which, incidentally, has spent years looking for social reconciliation with first inhabitants of its territory or with Kevin Rudd, who, besides not being responsible for the xenophobic harangue attached to it from "last Wednesday, has led a government some attentive to the minorities in his country. And while that statement is not an absolute fallacy (no longer shows a real discontent that goes beyond merely racist or xenophobic, so reducing it to just these terms may be an oversimplification), it does seem overly intolerant and full of bad faith. Although we do not like, we must assume that within a couple of decades, our society (like any company "Western") will be somewhat different to what we know today. He who knows capable of leading the management of coexistence and evolutionary development of this new society, it will be a man of value.
Inguna or the Australian state (Australia I think a very interesting destination), which, incidentally, has spent years looking for social reconciliation with first inhabitants of its territory or with Kevin Rudd, who, besides not being responsible for the xenophobic harangue attached to it from "last Wednesday, has led a government some attentive to the minorities in his country. And while that statement is not an absolute fallacy (no longer shows a real discontent that goes beyond merely racist or xenophobic, so reducing it to just these terms may be an oversimplification), it does seem overly intolerant and full of bad faith. Although we do not like, we must assume that within a couple of decades, our society (like any company "Western") will be somewhat different to what we know today. He who knows capable of leading the management of coexistence and evolutionary development of this new society, it will be a man of value. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment